avhception 2 days ago

When I read "PDNS", I will probably always think "PowerDNS".

  • walletdrainer 15 hours ago

    “PDNS” also often refers to “Passive DNS”, never heard of “protective dns” before.

  • feldrim 2 days ago

    Yes. That's why I put the footnote there.

    • avhception 2 days ago

      Well, I read that footnote, but I'm not sure if overloading the acronym is the best idea, is what I'm trying to say.

      • feldrim 2 days ago

        I agree with you there. But the term does not belong to me buy yo CISA and other organisations. But it's not as bad as Cyber Security Awareness Month acronym at least

mfro a day ago

I love Technitium DNS and have run it for several years now. Thanks for the contributions.

Milpotel 2 days ago

Don't get too exited - Technitium has a bus factor of one, a very small user base and no previous auditing.

  • johnea a day ago

    Yea, I often wonder when I see this type of article, why don't they just use bind9?

    No other DNS resolver is going to come close to it's number of deployment*years in operation.

    I didn't read the article though, since I'm not going to enable javasript and cookies just to read someone's blag post 8-/

    HTML much?

    • Milpotel 15 hours ago

      > why don't they just use bind9?

      Because bind9 is not a dns server but a collection of all available CVE types for further studying.

    • feldrim a day ago

      The only problem there is for GDPR consent thingy. You can disable and proceed. I don't use any telemetry except for the consent banners.

      When it comes to Technitium, well, it's written in the blog.

  • esseph 2 days ago

    And yet here I am deploying it in production

    • Milpotel a day ago

      You are a brave fellow!

      • esseph 20 hours ago

        Not so much, just old enough to do proper risk analysis and have safeguards in place.

feldrim 2 days ago

I've played with threat intelligence to build a simple, on premises PDNS out of a privacy-focused DNS server.